Does your business have a compliance monitoring system in place? Compliance monitoring is crucial for organizations of every industry to determine if their programs are responsive, practicable, and align with company characteristics. Compliance policies are designed to help companies and corporations of all sizes reach optimal performance in all work processes. These written standards of conduct help employees and partners understand their roles in the organization, and adhere to its rules and standards.
Organizations can only evaluate the effectiveness of their compliance policies and employee performance through a compliance monitoring strategy. Monitoring regulatory compliance is also helpful for making sure that all policies are up to date and aligned with the latest regulatory requirements. When companies are proactive in creating a compliance strategy, they find it saves time, improves efficiency, protects them financially, and reduces overall risk.
Read on to understand the importance of monitoring compliance policies and learn about the best systems for compliance monitoring.
What is a Compliance Policy?
A compliance policy or program describes procedures and guidelines outlining industry laws, standards, regulations, and rules guiding operations for an organization. These rules and compliance regulations are often put in place by authorities and government bodies. The goal of an internal compliance team is to create a comprehensive compliance program to implement at their company and enforce adherence.
What makes a successful compliance policy? One that outlines clear company policies, communication pathways, and the consequences of defying or ignoring these guidelines. Compliance programs provide value because they protect organizations from unexpected scandals and lawsuits.
Regardless of the industry, a successful regulatory compliance program must include the following elements:
Development and distribution of written policies and standards of conduct that promote the organizations’ commitment to compliance.
A designated Chief Compliance Officer and corporate compliance committee that are responsible for overseeing and monitoring the compliance policy. They will report their findings directly to the CEO and governing body.
Regular training programs to educate employees.
A transparent process for receiving complaints that assure the complainants’ anonymity and protects whistleblowers from retaliation.
A system for responding to allegations and taking disciplinary action when employees violate compliance policies and federal requirements.
Procedures for proper investigation and remediation of systemic problems in the organization.
The Guiding Principles of Corporate Compliance
All compliance policies should outline general principles and explain why these rules or compliance regulations are important to follow. Procedures must also lay out the methods of performing various job functions to achieve successful outcomes. Since compliance is a federal requirement, organizations that fail to create compliance programs or provide employee training put themselves at high risk for severe consequences.
“Organizations lose an average of $4 million in revenue due to a single non-compliance event.”
If a health institution doesn’t have compliance programs for federal regulations, such as HIPAA and policies for patient care, they could face serious lawsuits, federal fines, sanctions from Medicaid and Medicare, and could lose their accreditation. The cost of not adhering to compliance can be high. Clearly, it’s vital that organizations invest in creating compliance policies with detailed procedures to protect the company’s best interests and reputation.
Critical principles of corporate compliance include:
Ethics and Integrity: Having an ethical compliance process is crucial for business continuity and shouldn’t be treated as an add-on. Instead, it should be viewed as a key business strategy for long-term success. A company culture of ethics and integrity starts from the top down. An organization is only as strong as its leadership!
Risk Assessment: Risks to compliance need to be identified, owned, mitigated, and managed. All corporations should conduct regular risk assessments to identify areas for improvement. It’s also important to make sure employees understand risk management and how to create a plan for mitigating any risk.
Open Communication: Organizations must also put the protection of their employees first. Leadership needs to value their team’s concerns or reports of wrongdoing – even the most detailed compliance plan won’t work if employees don’t feel safe to speak freely to report criminal conduct or abuse of regulatory compliance policies.
Accountability: Businesses must take ownership and respond accordingly if policies are abused. While we are all human and a few compliance lapses may occur, your businesses should still be ready to accept accountability in those moments .
Clearly, there are many benefits of maintaining a structured compliance strategy like this. Wouldn’t you love to help your employees do their jobs well, achieve organizational goals, protect your business from risk, and promote positive relationships with clients and stakeholders? It’s a win-win for everyone involved! Now let’s move on to monitoring compliance…
Compliance Monitoring vs. Compliance Auditing
Compliance monitoring describes the ways an organization reviews and assesses how well they are following industry regulations and standards. This is done internally through a compliance monitoring system, which may include software solutions, technology, or other programs. The main goal of compliance monitoring is to identify compliance risks within an organization and then take action to mitigate those risks moving forward.
Compliance monitoring slightly differs from compliance auditing. Unlike monitoring, compliance auditing is a formal evaluation process done annually by third-party institutions. This type of monitoring occurs within an organization and falls under the responsibilities of the compliance committee and Chief Compliance Officer.
The Importance of Compliance Monitoring
Compliance monitoring is for making sure an organization is operating as it should. Ongoing monitoring compliance helps corporations identify areas of intentional or accidental non-compliance.
Documenting the findings of compliance monitoring helps organizations prove that correct procedures and regulations are the norm. This helps mitigate severe consequences if your organization has failed to comply with an internal policy or external regulation. Monitoring compliance is the first step toward improving performance and efficiency in various work functions and roles. By understanding the starting point, organizations can spot areas of improvement and work toward preventing it from recurring in the future. These actions will eliminate the possibility of costly fines, lawsuits, and sanctions.
“An organization that has made a robust effort to prevent and detect violations of the law by its employees and others acting for it will be treated less harshly than one that was indifferent to complying with the law.” – Rutgers School of Law
The benefits of compliance monitoring are different for every industry. For example, a comprehensive compliance monitoring program for IT companies helps them ensure that data privacy and cloud security policies are adhered to. But in the health sector, compliance monitoring improves patient care and ensures that best practices are followed.
Internal Process Auditing
Let’s talk about the difference between compliance monitoring and compliance auditing. Compliance monitoring takes place internally with help from your Chief Compliance Officers and their team. Compliance auditing is conducted externally through a third party agency.
Most corporate organizations prefer hiring third party agencies like the Federal Trade Commision or FINRA to ensure they are meeting regulations.
These third party agencies show up on-site (often unannounced), ready to search for proof of compliance. This means they will assess your staff training programs, procedure manual, and employee knowledge.
Even though compliance auditing occurs once annually or within three years, organizations should always be ready by ensuring that all compliance requirements are met. Many companies search for regulatory change management softwares or tools to stay updated on all compliance regulations.
Demonstrating Regulatory Compliance
Depending on the industry your organization is in, there are several ways to prove compliance. For example, doctors and nurses provide detailed documentation for patient interactions in order to avoid fraud claims.
Organizations should also prove compliance with HIPAA requirements. Medical service providers can work with accredited self-assessment providers, such as Jotform or MedTrainer. Corporate compliance platforms, such as MetricStream and CyberOne, can also help corporations prove compliance.
Companies can also prove compliance by reviewing their internal controls and policies annually. In doing so, you will get a chance to check in on your company’s current policies and make improvements where it’s necessary. This demonstrates compliance as members of the corporate compliance commission will compare your new policy with the previous regulations on their books.
Another way to establish compliance is by documenting continuous employee training. Demonstrating that your employees have participated in regular training is an indication that you have met the compliance requirements.
A Monitoring Framework
Effective compliance monitoring systems should include the following;
Objectives
The primary objective of compliance monitoring is to verify that organizational activities meet desired outcomes. Once your organizational policies have been set, regulaotry compliance monitoring will keep your company on track with your goals at every stage.
Timing
Compliance monitoring typically takes place per-activity or after-activity. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses. We will discuss these methods in more detail when we go over methods of monitoring compliance.
Comprehensiveness
Comprehensive monitoring focuses on sensitive activities that require meticulous scrutiny. Some corporations spot-check randomly selected procedures. Management may decide to review specific processes to determine if they pose serious risks. Managers can also develop sophisticated ways of evaluating high-risk activities, like those involving specific demography, done by a specific staff member, or within selected parameters.
Monitors
Even though management should take responsibility for all activities within the organization, compliance monitors may vary depending on the sensitivity of the activity. For example, managers can delegate compliance monitoring to employees who aren’t directly involved with the activity. This is common for routine activities with fewer risks.
Metrics
Metrics are a crucial component of business processes and monitoring. Set attainable and measurable goals, then use compliance monitoring tools to assess your ability to reach those benchmarks.
Outcomes
If the result of your compliance monitoring is that your organization missed the mark, take action. Strategize on ways to improve Is the desired outcome attainable? Have we met this benchmark in the past? What can we change to make sure this doesn’t happen again? These are all questions your organization should be asking when it fails to meet the standards it has set for itself.
Factors There are a handful of factors that will influence your compliance monitoring design:
The number of transactions – fewer transactions mean easy and fast monitoring.
Cost of monitoring – this compounds the staffing, financial, and other resources required.
Ease of monitoring – managers can employ the right software and tools that expedite or automate monitoring to improve the process.
Motives for non-compliance – managers should institute stringent monitoring for activities that employees can benefit from non-compliance.
“The three areas of compliance that organizations plan to focus on in the future are enhancing regulatory compliance and internal compliance assessments, elevating third-party compliance, and improving employee awareness with more compliance training.”
Self-monitoring: As the name suggests, an individual or a dedicated compliance team is assigned to evaluate their performance. This takes advantage of individual accountability and responsibility, eliminating the need for hiring a designated monitor. An internal audit department can then be used to ensure that self-monitoring actions are effective and not compromised.
Constant monitoring: Monitoring is done continuously instead of as a discrete periodic activity. Constant monitoring is done by managers and forms a crucial part of the company’s internal control structure.
Per-activity monitoring:Per-activity monitoring takes place in real time. An example of this would be an employee needing manager approval to complete a high risk transaction.
After-activity monitoring:After-activity monitoring is reserved for lower risk transactions or recurrent activities. Your business wouldn’t want to use per-activity compliance monitoring for a task employees complete 100 times a day. Your work would be backlogged significantly. After-activity monitoring can take place in the form of weekly check-in or quarterly review.
How Should a Compliance Monitoring Strategy be Structured?
The best compliance monitoring policies evaluate an organization’s adherence to laws and industry standards. The most comprehensive results come from a strategic combination of internal monitoring and external monitoring from a third-party. How will my company know which monitoring methods are best? Your organization can consult a third-party agency for recommendations based on your industry.
A continuous compliance monitoring system consists of several dynamic components: policy reviews, internal monitoring, external audits, and regulatory change management softwares. Below are the most common systems used for monitoring compliance.
Cycles of Operational Review
Operational review typically evaluates the operations and performance of an organization. While a policy manual outlines the accepted and expected behavior, an operational review evaluates if these standards are being followed. A full operational review examines communication, operational procedures, financial standings, HR issues, and other components affecting the company’s functionality.
Cycles of Policy and Procedure Review
If your company’s policies haven’t been updated in some time, chances are they don’t comply with new regulations. As technology evolves, so must your regulations and policies. For example, if you established your IT procedures in 2009, it probably doesn’t account for cloud servers and biometrics. It’s important to create a game plan for keeping your policies up to date to protect your organization from penalties. Break up your policy reviews into sections. Spread them out during the year so that you don’t overwhelm your team with a mountain of work to sort through.
Software for Policy and Compliance Management
Compliance policy reviews are more effective with the help of compliance policy management tools. Find a compliance management software tailor made for your industry to help streamline the compliance policy review process. You will need reliable software that creates advanced workflows, sends automated reminders to the compliance committee, and maps policies to accreditation standards.
Conclusion
Compliance monitoring ensures that an organization adheres to the relevant laws, rules, policies, and regulations. Failure to abide will expose a company to possible malfeasance, financial penalties, or malpractice. Organizations of all sectors, ranging from health, financial to education, must observe these policies and ensure compliance for ongoing business continuity and success.
Asif Alam is the Chief Executive Officer at Compliance.ai. A leader in shaping disruptive technology, his experience includes building products using AI and natural language processing for GRC, payments, lending, risk, trading, and new solutions, from Fortune 500 companies to startups.
In his most recent role, he served as the Chief Strategy Officer of ThoughtTrace, unlocking new revenue streams and markets, and reignite portfolio growth. ThoughTrace was then acquired by Thomson Reuters in 2021.
He brings more than 20 years of management and business experience; increasing profitability, unlocking new revenue streams and markets, and reignite portfolio growth for companies like Thomson Reuters, Crux Informatics, and Finastra. Asif is a forward-thinking expert driving engagement via client forums, public presentations, and white papers.
Cesar Lee is a Principal at WRV, a venture capital fund focused on early-stage investments in hardware, semiconductor, and other technology-related companies. Previously, he was an investment professional at Riverwood Capital, a technology-focused, late-stage venture capital, and private equity fund. He began his career at RBC Capital Markets, where he was part of the Mergers & Acquisitions group for two years and the Equity-linked & Derivatives group for one year. While at RBC, Cesar spent a majority of his time working on M&A advisory transactions for technology companies.
Cesar’s investment experience includes buyouts, later stage, early stage and seed rounds. Cesar has completed transaction in the U.S., Latin America, and Asia, and in technology sectors including data centers, software, semiconductors, consumer electronics, robotics, big data, and internet.
Maria Devassy is a RegTech, Content, and Technology leader with over 20 years of experience helping companies bridge the gap between technology, product, and business. Maria has held leadership positions with MetricStream, KPMG, Oracle Corporation, and other technology companies. She has launched several successful RegTech products, business partnerships, and advised Fortune 100 clients on risk management, audit, advisory, and compliance business across Industries.
Hugh Cadden is a recognized expert in derivative financial and trading markets including futures, options, and swaps. Hugh is currently a senior consultant and expert with OnPoint Analytics, Inc. an economic, finance and statistical consultancy specializing in expert testimony for complex litigation. He has been specializing in the organization, operation, and regulation of financial and trading markets for over 40 years. Hugh’s experience includes both the public and private sectors and he has held senior level positions with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission including serving as Director of the Division of Trading and Markets and Deputy Director of Enforcement. He has been qualified as an expert on financial and trading market matters before the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Tax Court, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, National Futures Association, American Arbitration Association and federal courts.
Drake Ross is a former bank regulator who specialized in compliance with consumer protection regulations while at the OCC, FDIC, and OTS. While at these agencies, he provided extensive training and guidance and developed materials to ensure full comprehension and proper application of rules, laws, policies, and guidance, and served as a Subject Matter Expert in numerous areas. Because of his expertise, he often presented at agency and industry events. He also played a significant role in successful windup of the 2008 IndyMac Bank failure, where because of his extensive knowledge of the FDIC deposit insurance regulations, he was called upon to administer highly-complex insurance determinations.
Carliss Chatman is an Assistant Professor of Law teaching Contracts, Agency and Unincorporated Entities, Corporations, and Transactional Skills. Her work is influenced by over two decades of service on non-profit boards and involvement with community organizations. Through leadership positions, she has developed expertise in corporate governance and non-profit regulation. She has also been instrumental in strategic planning and fundraising efforts. Prior to law teaching, Professor Chatman was a commercial litigation attorney in Houston, Texas. In practice, she focused on trial law, appeals and arbitration in pharmaceutical, health care, mass torts, product liability, as well as oil, gas, and mineral law. In addition to negotiating settlements and obtaining successful verdicts, Professor Chatman has also analyzed and drafted position statements regarding the constitutionality of statutes and the impact of statutory revisions for presentation to the Texas Legislature.
Sign me up for all regulatory updates
Get access to EITL Forum recordings
Mariam is an Operating Principal at Cota Capital. Mariam has experience providing guidance on strategic and operational planning to Venture and Growth stage companies. Prior to Cota Capital, Mariam spent her career in management consulting as a Director at KPMG. She has experience leading global transformation programs and developing innovative service offerings for Fortune 500 companies in the Technology sector. Mariam has an MBA from UCLA’s Anderson school of management with an emphasis in Finance and Entrepreneurship. She has a Bachelors in Science in Finance and a Bachelors in Science in Economics from Santa Clara University.
Chris Callison-Burch is an Associate Professor in Computer and Information Science Department at the University of Pennsylvania. His research interests include natural language understanding and crowdsourcing. He has served the Association for Computational Linguistics as the General Chair for the ACL 2017 conference, as an action editor for the Transactions of the ACL, as an editorial board member for the Computational Linguistics journal, and an officer for NAACL (the North American chapter of the ACL) and for SIGDAT (the special interest group for linguistic data and corpus-based approaches to natural language processing)
Tom Ladt is an experienced executive and investor. Tom has lead and served on the boards of several public and private companies serving highly regulated industries such as technology, healthcare, real estate, and food processing. Tom has also served in key governmental roles and on numerous community boards.
Jeroen Plink is a global executive with a proven track record of developing and growing businesses, teams, and technologies with innovation and passion. Jeroen was CEO of Practical Law US during its acquisition by Thomson Reuters. He now serves on numerous boards and acts as a strategic consultants for start-ups.
Global Legal and Compliance executive with 15+ years of success in the SaaS technology and financial services industries. Partner to the CEO and executive team in corporate transactions, business development, product expansion, and regulatory navigation during periods of intense growth and organizational change. An advocate of effective risk management that starts with sound business practices and putting the customer first.
Richard Dupree has held multiple Risk, Compliance and Operations positions at regional, national, and global financial services firms including Wells Fargo, Silicon Valley Bank, Bank of the West and BNP Paribas. Rick currently advises FinTechs and RegTechs and sits on industry panels, contributes to industry whitepapers, thought leadership efforts, and speaks at industry seminars on Risk and Compliance challenges faced by banks and FinTechs.
Brian advises clients on legal and regulatory compliance in the financial, tech, and procurement sectors. His passion is helping businesses succeed in heavily regulated environments. As counsel and trusted advisor to businesses of all sizes, and as a former regulator, policymaker, and federal official, Brian acutely understands the unintended burdens that even well-intentioned government requirements can put on innovation and business growth, as well as how to create policies that strike the right balance.
Brian served as National Ombudsman in the Obama Administration, leading the federal Office of Regulatory Enforcement Fairness in assisting hundreds of startups, entrepreneurs, and small business owners in every industry and every state.
Dr. Marsha Ershaghi Hames is Managing Director of Strategy & Development at LRN, a leader in advising and educating organizations about ethics and regulatory compliance, as well as corporate culture, governance and leadership. With the focus of inspired behavior versus required behavior, LRN is a leading voice in the industry for companies to build ethical cultures instead of “check-the-box” compliance approaches. She’s advised Department of Justice corporate monitors on successful program transformation under CIAs (Corporate Integrity Agreements. With over 20 years of experience in leading multinational ethics and compliance strategies, Marsha has become a highly sought-after thought leader on leading Corporate Compliance and Ethics practices.
Carla Carriveau is currently the Senior Managing Counsel at Wealthfront, an automatic investment service firm in Redwood City, California. Carla was previously Senior Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As a former regulator with over 15 years of experience in helping small businesses navigate legal and regulatory needs in the financial services sector, Carla advises Compliance.ai on financial services regulation, the regulatory landscape and industry practices.